Requests

The file size is 152.6 mb. I've found a ton of evidence through archive.org that it exists. Even if someone just had the first part with audio that would amazing.

This is a thumbnail I found. But of course none of the files still exist on there

sure, i have the original, but what makes you think there's audio in an ancient stickam capture? the original res is half the size of your screenshot

This. An mpg file contains both audio and video together. I've found several sources through archive.org as well that show it have sound.

Also, there is a second part with audio that I have. So there has to be a version of the first part with audio too.

Also, when you say you have the original what do you mean? Like the whole thing?

okay, but what makes you believe that the "first part" has audio just because some other capture has audio?

The file size. The one without audio is 15 mb. An avi file that contains audio is a ton of space.

Also, if you type camwins(dot)com into archive.org, go into the urls, and type "ellll" in the filter, you get one that says "ellllleeeee sound"

I don't know for sure, but seeing all the things I've found makes me believe that.
And if you look on the left of the screen there's a little orange line. It shows that when the user is unmuted from the other stickam screenshots I've seen.

>>5849 So, when you say you have the original, do you have the full video? Like all 33 minutes?

Or like the original whole screen capture? Because it cuts off after 12 minutes and 4 seconds on what I consider the first part. Then the second half is part of the same video (which has sound) which makes me think the whole thing does.

If you do actually have the original, can you tell me more about it?

i don't know about 33 minutes, but the video i have is about 21 minutes in one part with all the audio intact

>>5856
Wait, so you have the 21 minutes of the beginning? Or the 21 minutes near the end? Which is this one

the confusion comes from your beginning and end and first and second part. now i understand what you're saying. yes there are two videos at 33 minutes total with no audio for the first capture. again no reason to believe there is any audio for the 12 minute video. the video with no audio is essentially the same size per minute as the one with audio. audio doesn't take up that much space. a 10 minute low quality mp3 is a couple mb at most.
anyway, these thumbnail sized videos are not worth this much time and effort. the terrible audio is not worth this effort. it sounds like you have exactly what exists. the 120mb and 150mb files you found are shit converted streaming site files as is the OP pic, obviously. the filename you found claiming it has sound is the one you already have.

>>5859

I see. Thank you though. You're literally the only person who has given me a straight answer. So I appreciate it. Maybe it's out there, or maybe not. I will keep looking, but you're right, it's not worth that much effort. Thank you

>>5859
Even if there is no version of the beginning with audio, I am hoping to one day find an uncut version. Because it cuts off right after 12:04 minutes and I've just been wanting to see what happens after for so long. But again, thank you for the answer

>>5847
Is there a mega of what you have available? Having trouble finding the video through image search

>>5871
The first part can be found on xxxcollections-net. If you search "expose each other" on the site it will show up
Here's the mega link for the 2nd video though

just do mega-nz/file/
BrAS2LYZ#p94sqdKGUsuG54IBo9S-H8IWx9p017ae_ozZ9X5DfF0

There is another reason I do think there’s a part with audio.

From the same thread there was a different video (not the elllllllieeee) one. However it said one of the videos did have sound. And that one was an mpg file, which combines video and audio.

The file name with”sav195.mpg” could have sound. If it didn’t it would’ve been an avi file

the container has nothing to do with the presense of audio or video streams